Leader of Leeds City Council, Judith Blake, writes to the Prime Minister regarding the Adult Social Care crisis, and special funding arrangements for Surrey County Council

The Prime Minister
10 Downing Street
London SW1A 2AA

Prime Minister,

We are writing regarding funding arrangements for Conservative-run Surrey County Council. Specifically, the alleged reason behind David Hodge’s decision to drop a planned referendum on increasing council tax by 15 per cent to cover the severe shortfalls in social care, after apparently holding ‘several conversations’ with Whitehall figures.

It has been widely reported in leaked texts, sent by David Hodge supposedly intended for Nick King, Sajid Javid’s special advisor, that DCLG was working on a ‘Memorandum of Understanding.’

In response, as Leaders of Labour councils and council groups, we have a series of questions:

  1. Was a deal struck for Surrey County Council?
  2. If so, what are the details of the deal?
  3. Why was a special deal struck with Surrey behind closed doors?
  4. Does the Government finally recognise that local Government is grossly underfunded and is that why they have given a special deal to Surrey?
  5. Does the Government now recognise that there will be a £2.6bn shortfall in social care funding by 2020?
  6. If a deal was struck, will Ministers offer the same deal given to Surrey to all councils, regardless of political affiliation, when the Local Government finance settlement is published on 22nd February?

We have a crisis in social care, resulting from the Conservative Government’s cuts to local authority funding. Secret backroom deals are not the answer. We urgently need a proper solution, which means providing councils with the funding they needed to solve this crisis.

Given the public interest in this matter we will be publishing this letter.

Yours sincerely,

Judith Blake              Leeds City Council
Barrie Grunwald     St Helen’s Council
Mohammed Butt    Brent Council
Richard Watts          Islington Council
Stewart Young         Cumbria County Council
Simon Henig            Durham County Council
Nick Forbes              Newcastle City Council
Lewis Herbert          Cambridge City Council
Peter Martland        Milton Keynes Council
Warren Morgan      Brighton & Hove City Council
Jaz Athwal                 Redbridge Council
Sharon Taylor          Stevenage Council
Simon Greaves        Bassetlaw Council
Peter John                Southwark Council
Sam Dixon                Cheshire West and Chester Council
Steven Brady           Hull City Council
Iain Malcolm            South Tyneside Council
Ray Oxby                   North East Lincolnshire Council
David Budd              Middlesborough Council
Jean Stretton           Oldham Council
Simon Letts              Southampton Council
Sue Jeffrey                Redcar and Cleveland Council
Doug Taylor             Enfield Council
Susan Hinchcliffe    Bradford Council
Mark Townsend      Burnley District Council
Hazel Simmons       Luton Council
Alan Rhodes             Nottinghamshire County Council
Claire Kober             Harringey Council
Peter Box                  Wakefield Council
Christopher Akers-Belcher          Hartlepool Council
Richard Leese          Manchester City Council
Bob Price                  Oxford Council
Tom Beattie             Corby Council
Sachan Shah            Harrow Council
Bob Cook                  Stockton Council
John Clancy              Birmingham City Council
Julian Bell                  Ealing Council
Julie Dore                  Sheffield City Council
Steve Bullock           Lewisham Council
Shaun Davies           Telford & Wrekin Council
Terry O’Neill             Warrington Council
Stephen Lydon        Stroud Council
Phil Davies                Wirral Council
Alexander Ganotis Stockport Council
Steve Eling                Sandwell Council
Sarah Hayward       Camden Council
Peter Lamb              Crawley Council
Simon Blackburn    Blackpool Council
Steve Houghton      Barnsley Council
Jon Collins                 Nottingham City Council
Robin Wales             Newham Council
Alistair Bradley        Chorley Council
Stephen Alambritis            Merton Council
Darren Rodwell       Barking and Dagenham Council
Ian Maher                 Sefton Council
Ros Jones                  Doncaster Council
Roger Lawrence      Wolverhampton Council
Martin Gannon       Gateshead Council
Tim Swift                   Calderdale Council
Cliff Morris                Bolton Council
Pete Lowe                 Dudley Council
Tony Newman         Croydon Council

http://www.itv.com/news/2017-01-24/nine-out-of-10-councils-in-england-tell-itv-news-raising-council-tax-has-made-no-difference-to-social-care-crisis/

 

Advertisements

Government plan to take further £100 million from Leeds

Back in 2010, when David Cameron and Nick Clegg where pledging themselves to one other on steps on Number 10, Leeds City Council received £445 million a year in funding from central Government.  This is funding that is spent on front line services here in Leeds – on care homes, public transport, housing and our environment.  The Conservatives and Liberal Democrats cut this £445 million a year right down to £231 million a year – and now, the Conservatives want to take an additional £100 million from Leeds every year.  Leaving us with less than 30% of the Government funding we had before the Coalition came to power 6 years ago.

We’ve seen these ideological cuts to Education, to Health, to Defence and to our Police – but none of them have been cut by 71% as Leeds local Government has.

This has a very real impact on frontline services. Absolute poverty is estimated to affect 155,000 people in Leeds, and local Government is the most effective way of tackling this poverty.  Leeds City Council is doing what it can, by boosting apprenticeships and by paying the real living wage – but the huge cuts from the Conservatives are only taking us backwards.

When Iain Duncan Smith resigned from Government, he himself stated that “Certain policies..are more and more..distinctly political rather than in the national economic interest.”

These cuts are a political choice and not an economic necessity, and they are not over yet.

On Wednesday 14th September, Leeds City Council held a meeting of all Councillors, and voted on a motion to condemn the cuts already made to Leeds, and to halt the additional £100 million of cuts.  Unfortunately the Leeds Conservatives voted against this motion.

111 FINAL GRAPHIC PIC.jpg

The Government’s decision to take all this money from Leeds in such a sustained and counterproductive period of austerity has had an unfair and damaging impact on the city.  There are now 14,000 more people in Leeds, living in deprivation, since the start of these cuts.

Interestingly, this has not been the case in all Councils.  Down South, the Conservative run Council’s of Surrey, Buckinghamshire and Hampshire have received payments of £24 million £9 million and £19 million respectively, to help them cope with this imposed austerity.

In fact, if Leeds received the same level of Government funding per person as Wokingham in Berkshire, the council with the lowest level of cuts, we would have an additional £100 million per annum in our budget.

Just think what that could do to our levels of poverty and deprivation here in Leeds.

Cllr Judith Blake – Leader of Leeds City Council

The Conservatives promised to boost health spending – now they’re slashing it

Before the General Election, David Cameron said he would not cut Tax Credits. He lied, and he cut Tax Credits. Before the General Election, David Cameron also vowed to boost NHS funding and protect our National Health Services – another pledge which has come unstuck.

Over the course of the last parliament, the Government transferred responsibility for public health from the Department of Health, to Local Government. At the time the government promised to bring public health funding in Leeds up to a “target allocation” that would meet the population needs of the city given its size and diversity. In the first year Leeds received a 10% uplift in our public health budget, but for this financial year the grant was frozen with Leeds still £6m short of the government’s own target. Then just one month after the General Election George Osborne cynically announced he was clawing back £200m from the public health services up and down the country this financial year.

He’s pretending that these are local Government cuts, but these are cuts to front line health services and Leeds will see the largest funding cut in Yorkshire.

The public health budget covers things like sexual health, school nursing, health visiting, suicide prevention, domestic violence prevention, drug and alcohol treatment services and weight loss support as well as health protection services including immunisation programmes and infection control. The Government is slashing funding to all of these, while pretending that they are protecting health spending.

In fact the largest external organisation affected in Leeds, is Leeds Community Healthcare NHS Trust. Definitely an NHS cut.

One group affected is Skyline. Leeds Skyline provides support services for anyone living with or affected by HIV in Leeds. Next week is HIV awareness week, at the same time as the Government is withdrawing funding for vital services for HIV+ people. It is absolutely shameful.

Leeds Labour City Council is doing everything possible to save services such as Skyline, but with the Government raiding the public health budget in Leeds in year to the tune of £2.8million, on top of the existing shortfall of £6million, this is a difficult task.

Skyline demonstrates that these cuts are not just numbers on a spreadsheet, but real people and real lives.

Councillor Lisa Mulherin, Labour’s Executive Member for Health, Wellbeing and Adults is clear about the situation:

“The government promised to protect and enhance funding for public health in Leeds when it moved across from the NHS to Leeds City Council. The events of this year clearly show they had very different intentions. They held a sham consultation over 4 weeks in the school summer holidays and are now ploughing ahead with a raid on the frontline health services we contract predominantly from the NHS and third sector in Leeds. We knew the Government had contempt for local government but this shows complete contempt for the public as well and flies in the face of the government’s claims to be protecting health services. They are not protecting health services: they are cutting them directly through us.”

The Conservatives promised to boost health spending before the election. Their decision to now slash health spending is hitting people hard.

The Government must to stick to the pledge they were elected on, and reinstate health funding to Leeds.

Councillor Jonathan Pryor – Headingley Ward

Leader of Leeds City Council, Judith Blake, writes to David Cameron following the Prime Minister’s Council Cuts hypocrisy 

Dear Prime Minister

I am writing with regards to your recent letter to Councillor Ian Hudspeth, the leader of Oxfordshire County Council, and the offer of a meeting with your advisers in the Number 10 policy unit in order to discuss the implementation of local government cuts in your area.

In your letter to him of 14th September you stated:

“In that context, I would be happy to initiate a further dialogue with advisers in the No10 Policy Unit and yourself – please contact Sheridan Westlake if you wish to take this up.”

Letter from David Cameron to Ian Hudspeth, 14 September 2015, http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/shared/bsp/hi/pdfs/11_11_15_cameronletter.pdf

I note from media coverage and Labour MP Jon Ashworth’s letter to Sir Jeremy Heywood, that were this offer available to Oxfordshire Council only, as the local authority relevant to your own constituency, you would be in breach of the ministerial code which makes clear that your Ministerial facilities should not be used for constituency activities.

I therefore write to request a similar meeting with your Number 10 Policy Unit.

I share your concern about cuts to frontline services, including elderly day care centres, child care centres and libraries and agree that cuts to these areas would be ‘unwelcome and counter-productive’.

As a council we have borne the heavy burden of the last set of local government cuts by making all the ‘creative’ and ‘back office savings’ we can. Having made those savings, we are now faced with further budget cuts handed down by central government and we now see no other option but to consider cuts to front line services that will hit children, the elderly and the vulnerable in Leeds.

Yours sincerely,

Councillor Judith Blake

Leader of Leeds City Council

Tory cuts to vital local services in Leeds just keep coming

Leeds Labour Councillors have reacted angrily to a report that predicts a cut in funding by the Tory Government for the council’s services of nearly £70 million per year by 2020. This is on top of cuts to Health service funding announced within weeks of the new Conservative government taking office.

Since 2010 Leeds Council has been subjected to Tory cuts totalling £180 million which is some 40% of the funding towards providing local services despite 1-in-5 Leeds residents living in a deprived area.  Had Leeds received  a similar funding settlement to Surrey County Council then last year there would have been an extra £17 million available for Council services. Not only are the Conservatives attacking local services they are treating different parts of the country unfairly.

Along with the cuts impact of inflation and rising demand for many services the funding gap identified for 2016/17 is £49 million in the report which will got to the Council’s Executive Board on October 21st.

Leader of Leeds City Council Judith Blake commented:

“It’s wholly wrong that Leeds has taken a massive hit in terms of funding reductions in the last five years, especially compared with better off areas in the South. Money raised from Council Tax and other local income will have to stretch further and further to cover everything we consider vital. There is no doubt that the challenge for the city will grow as the Tory Government shrinks funding for services alongside hitting many residents’ incomes with cuts to Tax Credits. “